This blog provides a commentary on landslide events occurring worldwide, including the landslides themselves, latest research, and conferences and meetings. The blog is written on a personal basis by Dave Petley, who is the Wilson Professor of Hazard and Risk in the Department of Geography at Durham University in the United Kingdom.

This blog is a personal project that does not seek to represent Durham University.

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

First news of the Mw=6.3 earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand

Because of the severity of this event I have as a one-off posted on this blog.  All updates will appear on the new AGU website.

Christchurch in New Zealand was once again hit by an earthquake today, with the event happening at 12:51 pm local time (23:51 UT on 21st Feb).  As usual, the Geonet site is the best place for up to date information about this event.  At the time of writing (just over two hours after the earthquake, the location report is as follows:

A Google Earth image of the location of the epicentre shows why this earthquake is likely to have had a huge impact:

Note the reported location of the earthquake at the foot of the image.  In essence this is a bulls-eye hit of a substantial event on the city.  The Geonet reported magnitude is 6.3 (note that this is likely to change over the next few hours as the data improves), but the depth is very shallow (only 5 km).  The consequence is high levels of shaking in the city centre.  The Geonet shaking intensity map is based upon instrument data and reports by people on the ground.  As I write the map looks like this:

The squares are the instrument data, and the circles the eye-witness reports.  The red squares indicate MM=8 and the orange ones MM=7.  Christcurch itself is in the MM=7 zone, which in terms of buildings is "damaging".
Christchurch is probably the most "English" city in Australasia, which means actually that there are at least some masonry buildings.  An example is the cathedral - the picture pair below shows after (from here) and a file image from before the event:
The likely impact of the earthquake is likely to have been exacerbated by the timing in the middle of the day, which means that many people will have been in the street (unlike the September 2010 (Darfield) event, which occurred very late at night).  This means that many more people will have been in the way of collapsing buildings, breaking glass, etc.  Fatalities are very likely as a consequence.  Liquefaction was also a major issue in the Darfield earthquake, and is likely to be a major problem in this case too.

Readers may be interested in my images from the aftermath of the September 2010 (Darfield) event, which can be found here (the famous railway line images), here (the fault rupture) and here (building damage).

Because of the severity of this event I have as a one-off posted on this blog.  All updates will appear on the new AGU website.